NBA季后赛第一轮,常规赛西部第一的马刺以2比4不敌灰熊,成全了NBA历史上第四个“黑八奇迹”;西部半决赛,卫冕冠军湖人耻辱地被小牛以4比0横扫,三连冠梦碎;北京时间昨天,热火与凯尔特人的东部半决赛第五场,拼尽全力的绿衫军终究还是没能抵挡住热火的滚滚青春,1比4被淘汰出局。至此,NBA最近4年的总冠军球队全部覆没。《华盛顿邮报》记者迈克尔·李说:“今天标志着‘后乔丹时代’的正式终结,自1998年以来,NBA总决赛将首次没有大鲨鱼、邓肯和科比! ” 文/王书林
  情已逝
  谁安排相见与分手接着来,情正浓时你却冷漠地走开,漫漫岁月带走欢笑悲哀,今夜见你已经陌生旧情不再……
  最后3秒,凯尔特人队已经落后10分,雷·阿伦在毫无翻盘希望的情况下三分出手,毫无认输之意。哨声响后,加内特没有与对手寒暄,而是低着头直接转身走向了更衣室。不服和无奈,是绿衫军在赛后的众生相。
  凯尔特人绿色的球服下,一向流淌着不服输的血液,但在年龄和伤病面前,绿衫军也只能无奈低头。绿衫军的先发阵容,小奥尼尔33岁,皮尔斯34岁,加内特35岁,雷·阿伦36岁。先发阵容的年龄偏大是绿衫军在系列赛中失利的主要因素之一。双方的第四场比赛中,凯尔特人一度将热火队逼进加时赛,但正是因为在加时赛的体力不支,错失了好局。而昨天的比赛中,凯尔特人在大部分时间里都处于领先,最多的时候领先10分,但又是因为年龄带来的体能问题,让球队崩盘。
  比赛最后4分半钟时间,凯尔特人被热火打出了16比0!面对韦德的一次次突破,他们用失误回应;面对詹姆斯不讲理的连续三分命中,他们用失误回应。这支曾经最讲究关键时刻执行力的球队,又一次在比赛最后时刻失去了力气,就像他们在第4场加时赛中的脆败一样。
  这种无力感,我们在之前邓肯面对马克·加索尔、兰多夫的时候已经看到过;我们在科比再也无法像过去那样在第四节甚至用最后一次出手挽救球队的时候看到过。35岁的雷·阿伦、35岁的邓肯、35岁的加内特、33岁的皮尔斯、33岁的吉诺比利、32岁的科比……属于这些70后超级巨星们的美好时光,终于在这个5月,集体褪去。
  虽然现在,我们还无法预知结局,无法想像32岁的诺维茨基与38岁的基德是否会在6月的某一天最终捧起奥布莱恩杯,但是在经历了最近几年渐变的新阵代谢后,我们已经可以宣言,NBA80后一代超级巨星对于上一代的终结与取代,在今年的季后赛中,终于完成。
  勒布朗·詹姆斯、德怀恩·韦德、克里斯·波什、德里克·罗斯、凯文·杜兰特、拉塞尔·威斯布鲁克……他们终于羽化成蝶,他们仍然还在季后赛的舞台上美丽飞翔,甚至还有已经离开的德怀特·霍华德、克里斯·保罗、埃玛尔·斯塔德迈尔、卡梅隆·安东尼,你知道他们下个赛季会以更强者的姿态归来。而加内特们,即使还可以坚持,但舞台的中心,已经被全新的一批面孔占据。
  英雄泪
  看过冷漠的眼神,爱过一生无缘的人,才知世间人情永远不必问,热血在心中沸腾,却把岁月刻下伤痕,回首天已黄昏有谁在乎我?英雄泪……
  有时候你不得不承认,篮球就是这样一种运动:所谓的战术、所谓的体系、所谓的团队,也有在超强的身体素质与个人能力面前显得脆弱、不堪一击的时候。昨天就是又一个这样的时刻,韦德19投13中得到34分10个篮板、詹姆斯20投11中得到33分7个篮板、波什9投4中14分11个篮板———三巨头之外,热火再无球员得分超过5分,但他们仍然在主场击败了凯尔特人,率先晋级东部决赛。
  “这三个家伙太强悍了,其中两个更是怪兽,当他们两人同时手热得发烫的时候,想击败他们太难了。”绿军主帅里弗斯在赛后承认了对“皇帝”与“闪电侠”的无能为力。尤其詹姆斯得到了热火在昨天比  赛的最后10分,包括连续两个干拔三分命中,此外还以一记终场前37秒的灵敏抢断后上篮,亲自宣告了凯尔特人的死亡。终场哨响一刻,“皇帝”单膝跪地掩面哭泣,然后韦德上来安慰他,两人紧紧相拥,配上全场观众的欢呼,那场面仿佛球队已经赢下了总冠军。
  “这是我一直以来最想要击败的球队。”直至坐进了新闻发布厅,詹姆斯的情绪仍未能完全平静,所有人都可以理解他的心情,去年季后赛,在所有人都期待23VS24大结局的情况下,绿衫军突然杀出,毁了詹姆斯为克里夫兰带去一座总冠军的心愿。 “这一年以来,发生了太多的事,对于我转会的批评,对于这支球队的批评,这不仅仅是针对我个人的,但我很高兴,我们坚持下来了,而且还要坚持下去。这就是我那一刻那么激动的原因。 ”詹姆斯说。
  东部决赛,热火将等待公牛与老鹰之间的胜者。虽然他们看上去仍然只是一支三巨头之外什么也没有的球队,但他们已经证明了哪怕仅仅只是依靠三巨头的能力与决心,他们都可以战胜东部卫冕冠军。所有批评或者置疑的声音也许可以换成足够的尊重了,现在,三巨头要在芝加哥人号称联盟最强的防守面前,去继续证明自己。
Picture
 

The Tennessee Titans and USC Trojans have reportedly settled a lawsuit the Titans filed last July against the school when Lane Kiffin hired former Titans assistant Kennedy Pola.

According to The Tennessean, a joint statement called the deal "a mutually satisfactory agreement" and expected the suit to be dismissed "within the next few weeks."

In July, the Titans had claimed the Trojans were guilty of contract interference and inducement of breach of contract when Pola was hired away from the pro team before they opened training camp.

Former Titans coach Jeff Fisher admitted he was angry when Kiffin failed to give him a courtesy call before contacting Pola.

So you can check that off Kiffin's list of things to do to avoid getting into further trouble than he has throughout his coaching career.

A walking hazard, Kiffin has been controversial ever since he stepped foot on the football field, including his embattled days with Oakland Raiders owner Al Davis and calling out former Florida Gators coach Urban Meyer at a friendly Tennessee booster breakfast.

It's been a long and turbulent road for Kiffin, but he remains on the field because of his coaching ability and knowledge of the game.

The theatrics that have sparked around him have only further proven his fiery and energetic personality, the same personality that makes him a veteran football coach.

For college football's 10 most controversial coaches, check out Rob Weil's piece.
Picture
 

Jason Spezza had a goal and three assists to lead the Ottawa Senators to a 5-2 victory over the slumping Philadelphia Flyers on Tuesday night.

Mike Richards scored twice for the Flyers, who fell out of first place in the Eastern Conference and trail Washington by two. Philadelphia, which could have clinched the Atlantic Division title, lost its fourth straight.

Washington 3, Toronto 2 (SO): Mike Knuble scored in the fourth round of the shoot-out to lift the visiting Capitals, who clinched the Southeast Division title for the fourth straight year. Alex Ovechkin and John Erskine scored in regulation for the Capitals. The Maple Leafs will miss the playoffs for franchise-record sixth straight season.

Pittsburgh 4, New Jersey 2: Pascal Dupuis scored two goals for the host Penguins, who moved closer to clinching home-ice advantage in the first round of the playoffs.

Montreal 2, Chicago 1 (OT): P.K. Subban scored a power-play goal at 1:19 of overtime for the host Canadiens, who clinched a playoff spot.

Nashville 6, Atlanta 3: Jordin Tootoo and Sergei Kostitsyn each had two goals and an assist for the host Predators, who jumped to fourth in the West. They need one point in their final two games or a Dallas loss to clinch their sixth playoff berth in seven seasons.

Buffalo 4, Tampa Bay 2: Thomas Vanek scored three goals for the host Sabres.

Dallas 3, Columbus 0: Kari Lehtonen made 23 saves for his 17th career shutout.

St. Louis 3, Colorado 1: Kevin Shattenkirk had a goal and an assist for the host Blues.

Notebook: The New York Rangers said Ryan Callahan is out indefinitely with a broken right leg.
Picture
 

In Mel Kiper's NFL Mock Draft 2011 version 3.0 (his latest) he has the Chiefs selecting UCLA outside linebacker Akeem Ayerys. Here is Kiper's reasoning for this errant pick:

"Ayers surprised a lot of people with some mediocre workouts two weeks ago, given his reputation for athleticism, but that can't drop him too far, because the tape doesn't lie and his skill set is such that he can help a team early. A good fit on the edge in the Chiefs' system, Ayers fills an obvious need at outside linebacker in the 3-4 and isn't just a pass-rusher. More in the Mike Vrabel mold, he can cover, rush and tackle well against the run."

I think Ayers range and coverage skills make him a much better fit for a 4-3 system, and in a draft loaded with pass rush talent I think the Chiefs would be better suited to add someone that could help Tamba Hali put some pressure on the QB. Either way, I think the Chiefs should focus on other positions with their first pick.

In light of that, Kiper does a little better job with his backup plan:

"The Chiefs really need to land a wide receiver this offseason, and they could be the team that is willing to reach a little and get Leonard Hankerson or Torrey Smith at this spot. But they also need outside linebacker help, and that's a safe backup plan here. This team also needs a center, and Pouncey is the only guy who might fit the bill this high."

There is no doubt that the Chiefs need receiver help, but I don't think a team should ever reach in a draft just to fill a need. If they are going to select a receiver, they need to trade down to do so.

There is almost always a team prepared to throw in an extra draft pick to trade up, and the Chiefs could almost assuredly get at least one of those receivers in the second-round.

Pouncey is certainly an interesting choice, but I would worry about him being able to handle the center position in the NFL as he seems more suited for guard. I posted on the possible Pouncey-Chiefs marriage earlier.

Kiper also failed to mention the nose tackle position, and Phil Taylor would be a solid selection with this pick as well.
For Bleacher Report's full draft coverage of all teams be sure to check out the NFL Draft Center.
Picture
 
The Raiders are always one of the most unpredictable teams in the draft. Speed is usually the top priority for Al Davis and Co, but that hasn't turned out well for the team in years.

The time is now to focus more on needs and talent than sheer speed.

The Nationalfootballpost reports that the Raiders are looking at a former South Carolina Gamecock in the third or fourth round:

"South Carolina cornerback-safety Chris Culliver has a private workout with the Oakland Raiders, according to a league source with knowledge of the situation....originally projected as a fourth-round draft pick, Culliver has also drawn third-round grades from several teams."

Culliver shot up the draft board by clocking a 4.36 in the 40. I think we all know how much Al Davis likes a speedy player.

Not only is he a terrific cornerback/saftey but he also was the Gamecocks' all-time kick return leader with 2,476 yards.

After parting ways with Nnamdi Asomugha, the Raiders are looking very light in the secondary. Using a third round pick on a guy like Culliver is something the Raiders should seriously consider doing.

While you never know what's up the sleeve of Al Davis, conducting a private workout with a guy like Culliver is a step in the right direction.

Culliver had an injury his senior season that hampered him. This is the major reason he will fall to the third or fourth round.

With the burst and coverage speed of Culliver...he should be at least a second round pick.

Hold tight Raider fans and hope your owner does the right thing and takes Culliver in round three.

Click here for all of the latest on the 2011 NFL Draft

Picture
 

 

While the threat of an NBA lockout hangs above the 2011-12 season, that will not stop the 2011 NBA draft from taking place. Players are in the process of declaring for the draft or staying in school, and Sporting News will update you with the latest decisions from across the country. Will Kyrie Irving go? Will Harrison Barnes stay? We'll track all of the answers here, so bookmark this page and keep it handy.

The deadline to declare for the 2011 NBA draft is April 24. The deadline to withdraw from the draft is June 13. The draft will be held June 23 in Newark, N.J.
Picture
 
Detroit, MI (Sports Network) - Marian Hossa scored a power-play goal 51 seconds into overtime, and the Chicago Blackhawks earned a critical two points with a 3-2 victory over the Detroit Red Wings at Joe Louis Arena.

Detroit's Henrik Zetterberg, who tied the game with the man advantage early in the third period, was called for hooking with 3.7 seconds left in regulation.

It didn't take the Blackhawks long to convert as Hossa took a pass from Patrick Kane and let go a slap shot from the left circle that beat Joey MacDonald.

Jonathan Toews and Brent Seabrook also tallied for Chicago, which has won three of its last four games. Corey Crawford made 33 saves to notch his 30th win of the season.

The Blackhawks leapfrogged Anaheim in the Western Conference standings, moving one point ahead of the Ducks for seventh place. Anaheim hosts Colorado on Monday.

MacDonald, starting in place of Jimmy Howard, stopped 38 shots for the Red Wings, who have dropped four of five. Howard missed the game after suffering an upper-body injury Saturday against Toronto.

Detroit is six points ahead of Nashville for first place in the Central Division.

Picture
 

We’ve been doing interviews from bloggers who cover all the Teams in the N.F.L, but I didn’t get a response from some people so I turned to drafttek.com and asked if they could help out with some of the missing teams. The first of a few different drafttek interviewees is Joseph Mays who covers the Bengals as well as the Dolphins and Patriots. Below is what he had to say about Carson Palmer and the rest of the Bengals.
1) What are the Bengals biggest needs to address this off-season?
 
Prior to Carson Palmer’s sentiments on the franchise & his demand to be traded/threat to retire, Cincinnati was more than likely considering finding help at wide receiver, along the offensive & defensive lines (specifically OG & DT), as well as in the deep secondary. Of course now with the Palmer situation & the Bengals lack of talent behind him, QB becomes a high priority. With such an early selection in the 1st round they should easily be able to fill one of these big needs; the 4th pick will land one of the top QBs (Blaine Gabbert, Cameron Newton), WR (AJ Green, Julio Jones), DTs (Marcell Dareus, Nick Fairley), or DBs (Patrick Peterson). Obviously only 3 of the 7 I listed can be gone before the Bengals are on the clock so they’re assured of getting a top talent at a position of need. The debate then becomes, what position is most critical to fill now and/or who will make an immediate impact?
2). What’s going on with Palmer…is he seriously going to retire?
 
 
Part two: a lot of people think he has regressed anyway is this true or are they off-base?
2a) Clearly this is just my opinion. I have no “inside sources” around Palmer to actually know what he’s thinking. Whether or not his threat to retire if not traded is truth or a farce is known only to him. His attitude & statements filtered by the media, to me, make it sound that he’d be content to retire. He’s made a large sum of money and – according to him – saved a bunch of it. Does he need to keep working, at least as a QB in the NFL? Probably not. So there is some financial reasoning, paired with his current attitude towards the franchise, to believe he will simply walk away. On the other hand, he’s not washed up. With the proper system & personnel around him he can be an above average QB. He’ll probably never be elite, as many thought he would be, but returning to a “top 10″-type guy is certainly not out of the question. I understand the organization’s stance in the past on frustrated players – don’t trade them; make ‘em stick it out since, after all, they did sign a contract. However, this isn’t a RB or WR. This is your QB, a player that is ridiculously hard to replace. I know, preaching to the choir. But if you, as the owner/GM/coach, truly think he’ll walk away from the game instead of play for you, wouldn’t you rather get something for him? A starting-caliber QB, one that can be a top-10 guy in the NFL, is certainly worth a few draft picks. If teams want give a 1st for the Eagles’ Kevin Kolb, I’d think there’d be a team willing to give a 1st for Palmer. And that’s why I think this situation is different from the past Corey Dillon & Chad Ochocinco situations. If the Bengals could get a 2nd for a disgruntled & declining Dillon, I’d think they could get a 1st from a team such as, say, the Seahawks? The labor mess complicates things, of course. In the end, I’m of the opinion that, should the Bengals not trade Palmer when they can, he will retire.
2b) I said I think Palmer can be a top-10 guy in this league & I really believe that. He was easily a top 5-guy in 2005, top-10 in 2006 & 2007. Injuries have played a big part in his struggles the last 3 seasons and people have reason to question whether or not he can regain his form from earlier in his career. But I also believe that the talent around him and his frustration with the direction of the franchise has hurt him on the field. Around the trade deadline and in the offseason in all major sports you hear people talk about a “change of scenery” helping a player rebound. I think that’s the case for Palmer. Though his individual passing statistics may lead people to believe he’s more of the 14th-18th best QB in the NFL at this time, Pro Football Focus thinks otherwise. In their passer rating metric, Palmer ranked 13th in 2009 and 10th in 2010. I think that’s about right, based on his own talent. Should he join a team with more all-around talent, he could easily be in the 7-10 range for the next few years.
3). Let’s assume the Bengals draft a QB in the first two rounds…what’s your order of preference for these QB and a little bit about why, if you wouldnt mind.
This is a down year for QBs, in my opinion. However, the position is always overdrafted because of the importance of the position. Honestly I think the big name guys in this years draft are more suited, talent wise, to be picked at the back end of round 1 or early round 2. We know that Newton & Gabbert won’t last that long. They are almost everyone’s top 2 passers in the 2011 draft. I personally prefer Gabbert over Newton. Gabbert is the better all-around prospect because he has the size, mechanics, and intangibles every team wants. The only negative is the system he’s coming from and possibly his arm strength, a metric that I think can be overblown anyway. He has the strength to make all the throws NFL teams want, he just doesn’t have the cannon like Mallett from Arkansas. The reason I dislike Newton is three-fold: First, he has terrible intangibles. His off the field stuff is a huge red flag for me. There’s a lot already out there and who knows how much more the general public doesn’t know? Secondly, he isn’t the most accurate passer, one of the big reason people are down on Locker from Washington. Newton may not be able to make all the pinpoint throws necessary at the professional level. Lastly, his play diagnosing skills appear below average to me. Watching him play, especially in the National Championship game, it appeared that he would look at his #1 guy & decide to throw it to him or run. There wasn’t a real progression in his reads. His lack of accuracy combined with his below-average coverage reads drops him on my list. Truthfully, I like Ryan Mallett as a QB better than Newton. I think Mallett’s overall attributes are superior to Newton’s in every way, save for the elite athletic ability. Mallett also has the character concerns plaguing Newton. Should I be making the decision on who to pick for the Bengals, I’d only consider Gabbert with the #4 pick. In the early 2nd I’d consider taking Newton, but we all know he won’t be there. At that juncture I’d be very tempted to go Mallett, despite his off the field concerns. I’d also be willing to use my early 2nd round pick on Ponder & Locker. You want a list? Here’s my Top 5 QBs for 2011: 1-Gabbert, 2-Mallett, 3-Newton, 4-Ponder, 5-Locker. 
4). Something I’ve thought was a big reason why the Bengals went from playoffs to top 5 in the draft was a loss of idenity and production in the power run game…is that true? And, if so, how do they fix it? Is this problelm more on Benson or the Oline?
 That is definitely an intriguing argument. Let’s check the stats. Using Pro Football Reference’s OL run game grading metrics for the past 3 seasons we can see the progression of the execution of the players in the trenches. The standard 5 OL starters in 2008 average a running game score of approximately 40. In 2009, the average OL score jumped to 13. In 2010, it fell to 22. I can’t say how this compares with the other 31 NFL teams but it shows you that the o-linemen improved in 2009 and regressed a bit this past season, though they were still much better than the 2008 squad. When you compare the OL grades with overall run game production (yards per game, yards per attempt, rushing TDs, rushes of 20+ yards) you can start to see who may or may not be at fault. In 2008 when the Bengals OL was rather bad, the team ranked 29th, 30th, 31st and 29th in the aforementioned statistics. I’d say these bad results are as a result of poor OL play coupled with a weak backfield. In 2009, when the o-line improved by almost 4x, the team jumped to 9th in rushing yards per game and 4th in rushes gaining 20+ yards and made modest gains in yards per attempt and rushing TDs. This past season the offensive line regressed some but was still almost 2x better than the 2008 squad. However, the rushing statistics fell off drastically. Cincinnati fell to 27th in rushing yards per game, 32nd in yards per rushing attempt, 29th in rushing TDs and 31st in rushes gaining 20+ yards. Seeing how the OL was worse in 2010 than 2009 but not nearly as bad as in 2008, I blame most of the run game’s struggles on the backfield and not on the o-line. In fact, Cincinnati had 2 o-linemen rank in the top 10 in 2010 at their position according to Pro Football Focus. Andrew Whitworth was rated the 9th best OT in the run game (5th best LT) & Kyle Cook was graded as the 10th best OC in the running game. Guards Bobbie Williams & Nate Livings were above average, too. You can also see how the backs should be blamed more so than the line with the poor performance in the yards per attempt metric in 2009. Despite having a very strong OL in 2009, Bengals backs average just 4.1 yards per carry (19th in NFL). While a better RT would be ideal (Andre Smith?), the RBs need to shoulder more of the blame than the offensive line when talking about run game struggles. It is true that the Bengals shied away from the ground game in 2010. They were 15th in rushing attempts for the season after finishing in 4th the season before. I’d say the reason for relying less on rushing in 2010 was due to the lack of production from Benson & Company.
 
5). How are the last two draft classes coming along?
 At Draft Tek we actually graded the 2010 draft class about 2 months ago. You can find our thoughts on all 32 teams, all 7 rounds, pick by pick, here. To sum up the Bengals though, their 2010 draft class finished 17th overall. They did well with early picks, as Gresham, Dunlap, Shipley, and Atkins all look like solid starters/role players. They wiffed a bit towards the end with Hudson & Briscoe (good player, but now in Tampa), though they may have find solid depth along the OL with Stephens. The selections weren’t flashy but I’d say it was good draft to build with. Combining last year’s class with early impact guys in the 1st & 2nd rounds this season could lead to a quick turnaround.
I’m going to have to tell you to “hold on” with my evaluation for the 2009 draft class, as we at Draft Tek are doing the sophomore review as I write this. We hope to have a full 7 round, pick by pick analysis of the 2009 NFL Draft class by the end of March. Stay tuned for that!
6). Thoughts on the TOcho show on versus?
 I can proudly say I have not seen a single T.Ocho show. I applaud them for pursuing something they love, off the field. As long as there is no interference with the show & the team/their performance, good for them. I have no problem with players having lives outside football as long as they can separate the two.
7) Tell us a little bit about how the Bengals front office works on draft day?
 I really wish I knew how any front office works on draft day, but I have now knowledge how Cincinnati or any NFL team for that matter operates on the big day. I’d assume there’s a large role for the entire front office staff, with final say going to owner Mike Brown, though I’d hope he listens to his GM & coach. Like every team, I’d guess Cincinnati has a “big board” of prospects, ranked & separated by position. It’s also likely the Bengals have certain players marked that they’d be willing to trade up for (less likely this year) and scenarios where they’d trade down because they don’t like the value on the board.
  Lewis was invovled with the Senior Bowl, does he or the team seem particularly interested or attatched to any of the players from the Senior Bowl?
 
Marvin Lewis & part of his staff (at the time) coached the North Squad for the 2011 Senior Bowl. However, the only player that I have heard of so far getting some extra attention from Lewis and the Bengals is Michigan State LB Greg Jones. Jones was a star in college but questions about his size & play recognition ability has dropped his stock considerably. He’d most likely be a project at OLB in Cinci’s 4-3, available for a 5th-6th round pick at this point. Before scouts & talent evaluators really focused on his game tape & post season workouts, Jones was considered a borderline 1st rounder. However, his staff is showing interest in 2 Senior Bowl players that his staff did not have as much contact with: Baylor OG Danny Watkins & TCU QB Andy Dalton, who played for the South Squad (Bills coaching staff). Watkins is an interesting prospect. He’s a bit older (will be 27 for start of season) but is a real though & tenacious player; someone who has a mean streak. He has a great build and is very strong at the point of attack. He’d make an intriguing pick in the 3rd round, should he last that long. Dalton is fighting to be the top guy in the 2nd tier of QBs, behind the likes of Gabbert, Newton, Mallett and Locker. He seems to be losing ground to FSUs Ponder though. His stature reminds me of Drew Brees but his play is more reminiscent of a Trent Dilfer/Jeff Garcia spawn. He’d be a reliable, if not flashy QB.
9). Best and worst draft picks in the last 10 years?

Best Bengals pick in last 10 drafts? Well off the bat I’ll discount anyone from ’09 & ’10. I believe you need at least 3 years to properly evaluate a player, so that narrows things a bit. I’d have to consider Justin Smith & T.J. Houshmandzadeh (1st/7th round, 2001), Chad Johnson (2nd round, 2001), Levi Jones (1st round, 2002), Carson Palmer & Eric Steinbach (1st/2nd round, 2003) and Andrew Whitworth (2nd round, 2006). As a 7th rounder, Housh had a great 5 year stretch in Cincinnati from 2004 through 2008. He’s hard to top. In terms of “bang for your buck”, getting a lot of production from someone you don’t expect it from, he’s the guy. No questions asked. For longevity purposes & his overall body of work I’ll go with Chad Johnson, despite the headaches he can cause. However, should Whitworth continue to be a dominant OT it could be him. He’d have to do it for another ~5 years though.
Worst Bengals pick since 2000? This has to be a 1st rounder, no? The demands of an early pick are high so who hasn’t lived up to the hype and/or lofty draft status? Here’s a few to consider: Peter Warrick (4th overall, 2000), Chris Perry (26th overall, 2004)…actually I think that’s it, at least by my criteria. I guess technically the 2000 draft was 11 drafts ago so Chris Perry, come on down, you’re the biggest bust in the last 10 years of Bengals Draft History! Man, was that a bad pick. Here’s who else the Bengals could have had at 26 instead of the maligned Michigan RB: CB Chris Gamble (28th to Panthers), TE Ben Watson (32nd to Patriots), LB Karlos Dansby (33rd to Cardinals), OG Chris Snee (34th to Giants), or SS Bob Sanders (44th to Colts).
10). What’s a player that fans really seem to be interested early in the draft or late?
 Well everyone seems to be enamored with Cam Newton because of all the media attention he garners. He’ll go Top 12. I’m sure most fans are interested in how he does on draft day. In the later rounds I’d see people looking for where some big college players fall to. Someone like Oregon State RB Jacquizz Rodgers, Virginia Tech QB Tyrod Taylor, West Virginia RB Noel Divine, Nebraska RB Roy Helu, Wisconsin RB John Clay, Penn State RB Evan Royster and Pitt RB Dion Lewis. All these players were great in college but their game doesn’t translate well to the pros, for one reason or another. I’m sure many fans will be interested to see where these guys go & when – if at all. Most of those guys are currently 5th-7th round prospects. A few may even go undrafted.
11). Tell us a little bit about drafttek and why it’s the second best draft website on the web?
Well I of course think it’s the best, but I’m biased of course! But seriously, the guys at Draft Tek do a wonderful job. We have a pretty unique site filled with a lot of great information. Our mock is different from other sites because of how the results are produced. The full 7 round mock is simulated via computer based on analyst inputs, such as the team needs matrix, where analysts assign priority codes to every football position. In the last few years we’ve made the positions more specific. The matrix now features subcategories for multiple positions, like RB (feature RB vs change-of-pace RB) & WR (feature WR, possession WR, speed WR) on offense as well as splitting up defensive positions based on scheme (43 DT vs 3-4 DT, and so on). Analysts also have the ability to “grab” players instead of relying on the computer code or “lock out” layers that may meet positional criteria but may still not fit what a team is looking for. Not only do we have the standard mock draft (known as our “Consensus Mock Draft” because it combines the minds of ~20 individuals) but we also do some special features, like our past draft grading, as well as have our own big board with over 400+ players. The big board is a huge collaborative effort spearheaded by the famous “Long Ball”, one of the big guys of Draft Tek. I also can’t forget to mention the ODS, or Online Draft Simulator. Here anyone can make their own mock using everything Draft Tek analysts use. Each individual may change our positional priority codes, institute a grab, change the draft order, etc. to simulate how the draft may play out. It’s a unique feature you won’t find anywhere else. In fact, the guys at Blogging the Boys are doing a series of posts using the ODS to determine Cowboys draft results. Definitely give that a look. For those so inclined, you can follow Draft Tek on twitter (@DraftTek) or “like” us on facebook.
12). What’s the news on Jonathan Joseph?
 I fully expect Jonathan Joseph to return in 2011. He should be (and apparently is) the teams top priority once free agency begins. He was tendered a restricted free agent offer though no one is sure whether or not he’ll be restricted or unrestricted when the new league year officially starts. Better safe than sorry though. Joseph just finished his 5th season. He won’t come cheap; a lot of the top CBs in the league have recently signed contracts, such as Routt & Bailey. Joseph isn’t as good as the premiere free agent CB, former Raider Nnamdi Asomugha, but he’d certainly be 2nd on the list. The CB pair of Joseph & Hall is consistently underrated and losing Joseph would hurt more than some would think. But I fully expect the Bengals to resign their own, starting with Joseph.
13)  Anything else to add?
Thank you for your interest in Draft Tek and the opportunity to answer some Benglas draft questions. If there are any other questions about the Bengals (or Dolphins & Patriots, who I also cover for Draft Tek) or Draft Tek in general, just let me know. Definitely continue to check Draft Tek throughout draft season. We update our big board and computer-simulated mock every week plus we’ll be rolling out our sophomore reviews of the 2009 draft in the next week or two.
Picture
 
The Minnesota Timberwolves have done an atrocious job of drafting over the past couple of years. Recently, I wrote an article on why their 2010 drafting job was the worst ever which you can find here. I received a suggestion to write about who the T'wolves should take to improve upon their performance from last year.

It's important to note that it is my belief that teams should draft based on their needs. This means that they should probably avoid drafting power forwards, as Kevin Love is an All-Star, and Anthony Randolph has great potential. Small forward is also pretty much set with Beasley although I don't think he is necessarily a long-term solution.

If Perry Jones were to slip into the teens, of course I think you should take him, but if you think Jones is a little better than Kyrie Irving for example, you take Irving because he is a better fit.

Last season, the Wolves selected Wes Johnson, and although they may think he is the future at shooting guard, drafting a shooting guard would be acceptable given the right circumstances. Point guard and center are the positions the Wolves should key on. Ridnour has played well, but he's not the future of the team nor is underachiever Jonny Flynn who is worse than you think, trust me. 

While it's possible Anthony Randolph and Kevin Love play together in the frontcourt someday, the Timberwolves should try to pick up a true center because in reality, that probably won't happen. Darko is a serviceable big man but is better utilized off the bench.

With that said, let's examine 10 prospects that would be good players for the Wolves to target in no particular order.

I will write under the assumption that the Timberwolves have a top-four pick of their own and also the pick of the Memphis Grizzlies (lottery protected) somewhere in the middle of the first round. The Wolves could also easily trade into the second round and pick up players there.

Picture