The Raiders are always one of the most unpredictable teams in the draft. Speed is usually the top priority for Al Davis and Co, but that hasn't turned out well for the team in years.

The time is now to focus more on needs and talent than sheer speed.

The Nationalfootballpost reports that the Raiders are looking at a former South Carolina Gamecock in the third or fourth round:

"South Carolina cornerback-safety Chris Culliver has a private workout with the Oakland Raiders, according to a league source with knowledge of the situation....originally projected as a fourth-round draft pick, Culliver has also drawn third-round grades from several teams."

Culliver shot up the draft board by clocking a 4.36 in the 40. I think we all know how much Al Davis likes a speedy player.

Not only is he a terrific cornerback/saftey but he also was the Gamecocks' all-time kick return leader with 2,476 yards.

After parting ways with Nnamdi Asomugha, the Raiders are looking very light in the secondary. Using a third round pick on a guy like Culliver is something the Raiders should seriously consider doing.

While you never know what's up the sleeve of Al Davis, conducting a private workout with a guy like Culliver is a step in the right direction.

Culliver had an injury his senior season that hampered him. This is the major reason he will fall to the third or fourth round.

With the burst and coverage speed of Culliver...he should be at least a second round pick.

Hold tight Raider fans and hope your owner does the right thing and takes Culliver in round three.

Click here for all of the latest on the 2011 NFL Draft

Picture
 

 

While the threat of an NBA lockout hangs above the 2011-12 season, that will not stop the 2011 NBA draft from taking place. Players are in the process of declaring for the draft or staying in school, and Sporting News will update you with the latest decisions from across the country. Will Kyrie Irving go? Will Harrison Barnes stay? We'll track all of the answers here, so bookmark this page and keep it handy.

The deadline to declare for the 2011 NBA draft is April 24. The deadline to withdraw from the draft is June 13. The draft will be held June 23 in Newark, N.J.
Picture
 
Detroit, MI (Sports Network) - Marian Hossa scored a power-play goal 51 seconds into overtime, and the Chicago Blackhawks earned a critical two points with a 3-2 victory over the Detroit Red Wings at Joe Louis Arena.

Detroit's Henrik Zetterberg, who tied the game with the man advantage early in the third period, was called for hooking with 3.7 seconds left in regulation.

It didn't take the Blackhawks long to convert as Hossa took a pass from Patrick Kane and let go a slap shot from the left circle that beat Joey MacDonald.

Jonathan Toews and Brent Seabrook also tallied for Chicago, which has won three of its last four games. Corey Crawford made 33 saves to notch his 30th win of the season.

The Blackhawks leapfrogged Anaheim in the Western Conference standings, moving one point ahead of the Ducks for seventh place. Anaheim hosts Colorado on Monday.

MacDonald, starting in place of Jimmy Howard, stopped 38 shots for the Red Wings, who have dropped four of five. Howard missed the game after suffering an upper-body injury Saturday against Toronto.

Detroit is six points ahead of Nashville for first place in the Central Division.

Picture
 

We’ve been doing interviews from bloggers who cover all the Teams in the N.F.L, but I didn’t get a response from some people so I turned to drafttek.com and asked if they could help out with some of the missing teams. The first of a few different drafttek interviewees is Joseph Mays who covers the Bengals as well as the Dolphins and Patriots. Below is what he had to say about Carson Palmer and the rest of the Bengals.
1) What are the Bengals biggest needs to address this off-season?
 
Prior to Carson Palmer’s sentiments on the franchise & his demand to be traded/threat to retire, Cincinnati was more than likely considering finding help at wide receiver, along the offensive & defensive lines (specifically OG & DT), as well as in the deep secondary. Of course now with the Palmer situation & the Bengals lack of talent behind him, QB becomes a high priority. With such an early selection in the 1st round they should easily be able to fill one of these big needs; the 4th pick will land one of the top QBs (Blaine Gabbert, Cameron Newton), WR (AJ Green, Julio Jones), DTs (Marcell Dareus, Nick Fairley), or DBs (Patrick Peterson). Obviously only 3 of the 7 I listed can be gone before the Bengals are on the clock so they’re assured of getting a top talent at a position of need. The debate then becomes, what position is most critical to fill now and/or who will make an immediate impact?
2). What’s going on with Palmer…is he seriously going to retire?
 
 
Part two: a lot of people think he has regressed anyway is this true or are they off-base?
2a) Clearly this is just my opinion. I have no “inside sources” around Palmer to actually know what he’s thinking. Whether or not his threat to retire if not traded is truth or a farce is known only to him. His attitude & statements filtered by the media, to me, make it sound that he’d be content to retire. He’s made a large sum of money and – according to him – saved a bunch of it. Does he need to keep working, at least as a QB in the NFL? Probably not. So there is some financial reasoning, paired with his current attitude towards the franchise, to believe he will simply walk away. On the other hand, he’s not washed up. With the proper system & personnel around him he can be an above average QB. He’ll probably never be elite, as many thought he would be, but returning to a “top 10″-type guy is certainly not out of the question. I understand the organization’s stance in the past on frustrated players – don’t trade them; make ‘em stick it out since, after all, they did sign a contract. However, this isn’t a RB or WR. This is your QB, a player that is ridiculously hard to replace. I know, preaching to the choir. But if you, as the owner/GM/coach, truly think he’ll walk away from the game instead of play for you, wouldn’t you rather get something for him? A starting-caliber QB, one that can be a top-10 guy in the NFL, is certainly worth a few draft picks. If teams want give a 1st for the Eagles’ Kevin Kolb, I’d think there’d be a team willing to give a 1st for Palmer. And that’s why I think this situation is different from the past Corey Dillon & Chad Ochocinco situations. If the Bengals could get a 2nd for a disgruntled & declining Dillon, I’d think they could get a 1st from a team such as, say, the Seahawks? The labor mess complicates things, of course. In the end, I’m of the opinion that, should the Bengals not trade Palmer when they can, he will retire.
2b) I said I think Palmer can be a top-10 guy in this league & I really believe that. He was easily a top 5-guy in 2005, top-10 in 2006 & 2007. Injuries have played a big part in his struggles the last 3 seasons and people have reason to question whether or not he can regain his form from earlier in his career. But I also believe that the talent around him and his frustration with the direction of the franchise has hurt him on the field. Around the trade deadline and in the offseason in all major sports you hear people talk about a “change of scenery” helping a player rebound. I think that’s the case for Palmer. Though his individual passing statistics may lead people to believe he’s more of the 14th-18th best QB in the NFL at this time, Pro Football Focus thinks otherwise. In their passer rating metric, Palmer ranked 13th in 2009 and 10th in 2010. I think that’s about right, based on his own talent. Should he join a team with more all-around talent, he could easily be in the 7-10 range for the next few years.
3). Let’s assume the Bengals draft a QB in the first two rounds…what’s your order of preference for these QB and a little bit about why, if you wouldnt mind.
This is a down year for QBs, in my opinion. However, the position is always overdrafted because of the importance of the position. Honestly I think the big name guys in this years draft are more suited, talent wise, to be picked at the back end of round 1 or early round 2. We know that Newton & Gabbert won’t last that long. They are almost everyone’s top 2 passers in the 2011 draft. I personally prefer Gabbert over Newton. Gabbert is the better all-around prospect because he has the size, mechanics, and intangibles every team wants. The only negative is the system he’s coming from and possibly his arm strength, a metric that I think can be overblown anyway. He has the strength to make all the throws NFL teams want, he just doesn’t have the cannon like Mallett from Arkansas. The reason I dislike Newton is three-fold: First, he has terrible intangibles. His off the field stuff is a huge red flag for me. There’s a lot already out there and who knows how much more the general public doesn’t know? Secondly, he isn’t the most accurate passer, one of the big reason people are down on Locker from Washington. Newton may not be able to make all the pinpoint throws necessary at the professional level. Lastly, his play diagnosing skills appear below average to me. Watching him play, especially in the National Championship game, it appeared that he would look at his #1 guy & decide to throw it to him or run. There wasn’t a real progression in his reads. His lack of accuracy combined with his below-average coverage reads drops him on my list. Truthfully, I like Ryan Mallett as a QB better than Newton. I think Mallett’s overall attributes are superior to Newton’s in every way, save for the elite athletic ability. Mallett also has the character concerns plaguing Newton. Should I be making the decision on who to pick for the Bengals, I’d only consider Gabbert with the #4 pick. In the early 2nd I’d consider taking Newton, but we all know he won’t be there. At that juncture I’d be very tempted to go Mallett, despite his off the field concerns. I’d also be willing to use my early 2nd round pick on Ponder & Locker. You want a list? Here’s my Top 5 QBs for 2011: 1-Gabbert, 2-Mallett, 3-Newton, 4-Ponder, 5-Locker. 
4). Something I’ve thought was a big reason why the Bengals went from playoffs to top 5 in the draft was a loss of idenity and production in the power run game…is that true? And, if so, how do they fix it? Is this problelm more on Benson or the Oline?
 That is definitely an intriguing argument. Let’s check the stats. Using Pro Football Reference’s OL run game grading metrics for the past 3 seasons we can see the progression of the execution of the players in the trenches. The standard 5 OL starters in 2008 average a running game score of approximately 40. In 2009, the average OL score jumped to 13. In 2010, it fell to 22. I can’t say how this compares with the other 31 NFL teams but it shows you that the o-linemen improved in 2009 and regressed a bit this past season, though they were still much better than the 2008 squad. When you compare the OL grades with overall run game production (yards per game, yards per attempt, rushing TDs, rushes of 20+ yards) you can start to see who may or may not be at fault. In 2008 when the Bengals OL was rather bad, the team ranked 29th, 30th, 31st and 29th in the aforementioned statistics. I’d say these bad results are as a result of poor OL play coupled with a weak backfield. In 2009, when the o-line improved by almost 4x, the team jumped to 9th in rushing yards per game and 4th in rushes gaining 20+ yards and made modest gains in yards per attempt and rushing TDs. This past season the offensive line regressed some but was still almost 2x better than the 2008 squad. However, the rushing statistics fell off drastically. Cincinnati fell to 27th in rushing yards per game, 32nd in yards per rushing attempt, 29th in rushing TDs and 31st in rushes gaining 20+ yards. Seeing how the OL was worse in 2010 than 2009 but not nearly as bad as in 2008, I blame most of the run game’s struggles on the backfield and not on the o-line. In fact, Cincinnati had 2 o-linemen rank in the top 10 in 2010 at their position according to Pro Football Focus. Andrew Whitworth was rated the 9th best OT in the run game (5th best LT) & Kyle Cook was graded as the 10th best OC in the running game. Guards Bobbie Williams & Nate Livings were above average, too. You can also see how the backs should be blamed more so than the line with the poor performance in the yards per attempt metric in 2009. Despite having a very strong OL in 2009, Bengals backs average just 4.1 yards per carry (19th in NFL). While a better RT would be ideal (Andre Smith?), the RBs need to shoulder more of the blame than the offensive line when talking about run game struggles. It is true that the Bengals shied away from the ground game in 2010. They were 15th in rushing attempts for the season after finishing in 4th the season before. I’d say the reason for relying less on rushing in 2010 was due to the lack of production from Benson & Company.
 
5). How are the last two draft classes coming along?
 At Draft Tek we actually graded the 2010 draft class about 2 months ago. You can find our thoughts on all 32 teams, all 7 rounds, pick by pick, here. To sum up the Bengals though, their 2010 draft class finished 17th overall. They did well with early picks, as Gresham, Dunlap, Shipley, and Atkins all look like solid starters/role players. They wiffed a bit towards the end with Hudson & Briscoe (good player, but now in Tampa), though they may have find solid depth along the OL with Stephens. The selections weren’t flashy but I’d say it was good draft to build with. Combining last year’s class with early impact guys in the 1st & 2nd rounds this season could lead to a quick turnaround.
I’m going to have to tell you to “hold on” with my evaluation for the 2009 draft class, as we at Draft Tek are doing the sophomore review as I write this. We hope to have a full 7 round, pick by pick analysis of the 2009 NFL Draft class by the end of March. Stay tuned for that!
6). Thoughts on the TOcho show on versus?
 I can proudly say I have not seen a single T.Ocho show. I applaud them for pursuing something they love, off the field. As long as there is no interference with the show & the team/their performance, good for them. I have no problem with players having lives outside football as long as they can separate the two.
7) Tell us a little bit about how the Bengals front office works on draft day?
 I really wish I knew how any front office works on draft day, but I have now knowledge how Cincinnati or any NFL team for that matter operates on the big day. I’d assume there’s a large role for the entire front office staff, with final say going to owner Mike Brown, though I’d hope he listens to his GM & coach. Like every team, I’d guess Cincinnati has a “big board” of prospects, ranked & separated by position. It’s also likely the Bengals have certain players marked that they’d be willing to trade up for (less likely this year) and scenarios where they’d trade down because they don’t like the value on the board.
  Lewis was invovled with the Senior Bowl, does he or the team seem particularly interested or attatched to any of the players from the Senior Bowl?
 
Marvin Lewis & part of his staff (at the time) coached the North Squad for the 2011 Senior Bowl. However, the only player that I have heard of so far getting some extra attention from Lewis and the Bengals is Michigan State LB Greg Jones. Jones was a star in college but questions about his size & play recognition ability has dropped his stock considerably. He’d most likely be a project at OLB in Cinci’s 4-3, available for a 5th-6th round pick at this point. Before scouts & talent evaluators really focused on his game tape & post season workouts, Jones was considered a borderline 1st rounder. However, his staff is showing interest in 2 Senior Bowl players that his staff did not have as much contact with: Baylor OG Danny Watkins & TCU QB Andy Dalton, who played for the South Squad (Bills coaching staff). Watkins is an interesting prospect. He’s a bit older (will be 27 for start of season) but is a real though & tenacious player; someone who has a mean streak. He has a great build and is very strong at the point of attack. He’d make an intriguing pick in the 3rd round, should he last that long. Dalton is fighting to be the top guy in the 2nd tier of QBs, behind the likes of Gabbert, Newton, Mallett and Locker. He seems to be losing ground to FSUs Ponder though. His stature reminds me of Drew Brees but his play is more reminiscent of a Trent Dilfer/Jeff Garcia spawn. He’d be a reliable, if not flashy QB.
9). Best and worst draft picks in the last 10 years?

Best Bengals pick in last 10 drafts? Well off the bat I’ll discount anyone from ’09 & ’10. I believe you need at least 3 years to properly evaluate a player, so that narrows things a bit. I’d have to consider Justin Smith & T.J. Houshmandzadeh (1st/7th round, 2001), Chad Johnson (2nd round, 2001), Levi Jones (1st round, 2002), Carson Palmer & Eric Steinbach (1st/2nd round, 2003) and Andrew Whitworth (2nd round, 2006). As a 7th rounder, Housh had a great 5 year stretch in Cincinnati from 2004 through 2008. He’s hard to top. In terms of “bang for your buck”, getting a lot of production from someone you don’t expect it from, he’s the guy. No questions asked. For longevity purposes & his overall body of work I’ll go with Chad Johnson, despite the headaches he can cause. However, should Whitworth continue to be a dominant OT it could be him. He’d have to do it for another ~5 years though.
Worst Bengals pick since 2000? This has to be a 1st rounder, no? The demands of an early pick are high so who hasn’t lived up to the hype and/or lofty draft status? Here’s a few to consider: Peter Warrick (4th overall, 2000), Chris Perry (26th overall, 2004)…actually I think that’s it, at least by my criteria. I guess technically the 2000 draft was 11 drafts ago so Chris Perry, come on down, you’re the biggest bust in the last 10 years of Bengals Draft History! Man, was that a bad pick. Here’s who else the Bengals could have had at 26 instead of the maligned Michigan RB: CB Chris Gamble (28th to Panthers), TE Ben Watson (32nd to Patriots), LB Karlos Dansby (33rd to Cardinals), OG Chris Snee (34th to Giants), or SS Bob Sanders (44th to Colts).
10). What’s a player that fans really seem to be interested early in the draft or late?
 Well everyone seems to be enamored with Cam Newton because of all the media attention he garners. He’ll go Top 12. I’m sure most fans are interested in how he does on draft day. In the later rounds I’d see people looking for where some big college players fall to. Someone like Oregon State RB Jacquizz Rodgers, Virginia Tech QB Tyrod Taylor, West Virginia RB Noel Divine, Nebraska RB Roy Helu, Wisconsin RB John Clay, Penn State RB Evan Royster and Pitt RB Dion Lewis. All these players were great in college but their game doesn’t translate well to the pros, for one reason or another. I’m sure many fans will be interested to see where these guys go & when – if at all. Most of those guys are currently 5th-7th round prospects. A few may even go undrafted.
11). Tell us a little bit about drafttek and why it’s the second best draft website on the web?
Well I of course think it’s the best, but I’m biased of course! But seriously, the guys at Draft Tek do a wonderful job. We have a pretty unique site filled with a lot of great information. Our mock is different from other sites because of how the results are produced. The full 7 round mock is simulated via computer based on analyst inputs, such as the team needs matrix, where analysts assign priority codes to every football position. In the last few years we’ve made the positions more specific. The matrix now features subcategories for multiple positions, like RB (feature RB vs change-of-pace RB) & WR (feature WR, possession WR, speed WR) on offense as well as splitting up defensive positions based on scheme (43 DT vs 3-4 DT, and so on). Analysts also have the ability to “grab” players instead of relying on the computer code or “lock out” layers that may meet positional criteria but may still not fit what a team is looking for. Not only do we have the standard mock draft (known as our “Consensus Mock Draft” because it combines the minds of ~20 individuals) but we also do some special features, like our past draft grading, as well as have our own big board with over 400+ players. The big board is a huge collaborative effort spearheaded by the famous “Long Ball”, one of the big guys of Draft Tek. I also can’t forget to mention the ODS, or Online Draft Simulator. Here anyone can make their own mock using everything Draft Tek analysts use. Each individual may change our positional priority codes, institute a grab, change the draft order, etc. to simulate how the draft may play out. It’s a unique feature you won’t find anywhere else. In fact, the guys at Blogging the Boys are doing a series of posts using the ODS to determine Cowboys draft results. Definitely give that a look. For those so inclined, you can follow Draft Tek on twitter (@DraftTek) or “like” us on facebook.
12). What’s the news on Jonathan Joseph?
 I fully expect Jonathan Joseph to return in 2011. He should be (and apparently is) the teams top priority once free agency begins. He was tendered a restricted free agent offer though no one is sure whether or not he’ll be restricted or unrestricted when the new league year officially starts. Better safe than sorry though. Joseph just finished his 5th season. He won’t come cheap; a lot of the top CBs in the league have recently signed contracts, such as Routt & Bailey. Joseph isn’t as good as the premiere free agent CB, former Raider Nnamdi Asomugha, but he’d certainly be 2nd on the list. The CB pair of Joseph & Hall is consistently underrated and losing Joseph would hurt more than some would think. But I fully expect the Bengals to resign their own, starting with Joseph.
13)  Anything else to add?
Thank you for your interest in Draft Tek and the opportunity to answer some Benglas draft questions. If there are any other questions about the Bengals (or Dolphins & Patriots, who I also cover for Draft Tek) or Draft Tek in general, just let me know. Definitely continue to check Draft Tek throughout draft season. We update our big board and computer-simulated mock every week plus we’ll be rolling out our sophomore reviews of the 2009 draft in the next week or two.
Picture
 
The Minnesota Timberwolves have done an atrocious job of drafting over the past couple of years. Recently, I wrote an article on why their 2010 drafting job was the worst ever which you can find here. I received a suggestion to write about who the T'wolves should take to improve upon their performance from last year.

It's important to note that it is my belief that teams should draft based on their needs. This means that they should probably avoid drafting power forwards, as Kevin Love is an All-Star, and Anthony Randolph has great potential. Small forward is also pretty much set with Beasley although I don't think he is necessarily a long-term solution.

If Perry Jones were to slip into the teens, of course I think you should take him, but if you think Jones is a little better than Kyrie Irving for example, you take Irving because he is a better fit.

Last season, the Wolves selected Wes Johnson, and although they may think he is the future at shooting guard, drafting a shooting guard would be acceptable given the right circumstances. Point guard and center are the positions the Wolves should key on. Ridnour has played well, but he's not the future of the team nor is underachiever Jonny Flynn who is worse than you think, trust me. 

While it's possible Anthony Randolph and Kevin Love play together in the frontcourt someday, the Timberwolves should try to pick up a true center because in reality, that probably won't happen. Darko is a serviceable big man but is better utilized off the bench.

With that said, let's examine 10 prospects that would be good players for the Wolves to target in no particular order.

I will write under the assumption that the Timberwolves have a top-four pick of their own and also the pick of the Memphis Grizzlies (lottery protected) somewhere in the middle of the first round. The Wolves could also easily trade into the second round and pick up players there.

Picture
 

This has been a busy off season for some NFL players. Granted, some are using the lockout to rest up and vacation, but others are using the time to delve into unrequited passions.

With the players being locked out. There is no need to obey contract stipulations for off season hobbies. Dallas Clark will be in an episode of Criminal Minds. Tom Zbikowski used the lockout to return to the boxing ring.

Chad Ochocinco is just the latest NFL player to delve head first into another arena while he can. The man loves his futbol. He is halfway through a four day tryout with MLS side Sporting Kansas City.

Chad has not thrilled the scouts and coaching staff thus far. He has been winded and a tad rusty since his playing days as a youth. Making the team would be icing on the cake though.

This is about reliving a dream. You see soccer was Chad Ochocinco's first passion. He merely wants to return to see where he matches up. At worst, it is a fine tuning exercise for whenever the NFL heats up again.

It has not been the smoothest ride however. Ocho exclaimed earlier in a tweet:

"I wish you all can see the skill it takes to play FUTBOL,even with my speed these guys still make me look like s–t on the pitch #seriously"

It seems he eventually got the hang of things. At the very least he found a niche that he was comfortable with on the pitch.

"Superb day on the pitch, I’m gonna be in phenomenal shape once football rolls back around,my feet were awesome b4 they gone b like WTF now!!!”

So it goes for one of the best receivers in the game. You cannot merely switch to another professional sport at his age and expect great results. Someone get Michael Jordan on the phone.

This is a rare opportunity for NFL players. They have a few months to do whatever they want. It is refreshing to see where their hearts lie off of the gridiron.
Picture
 
 

Every year, 1.7 million Americans seek medical care for a traumatic brain injury, and countless more never do. Unfortunately, for decades traumatic brain injury has been a silent epidemic, exacting a confusing and heavy burden on patients, their caregivers, employers, families and friends.

That changed when U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz., survived a gunshot wound to the head and NFL star Dave Duerson committed suicide so his brain could be donated to researchers to assess the consequences of traumatic brain injuries incurred on the gridiron.

The silent epidemic suddenly roared.

The tremendous burden of this disease was revealed, not only for severely injured patients like Giffords and Duerson, but also for athletes, victims of car accidents and children on the playground. Yet traumatic brain injury remains one of the greatest unmet needs in medicine and public health. Why?

Funding for traumatic brain injury by the National Institutes of Health this year is an estimated $85 million out of its $32 billion budget, or less than 0.3 percent -- compared to the $60 billion combined costs of traumatic brain injury in the year 2000 (the last figures to date) for acute care and indirect expenses for lost productivity. Put in context, the amount of dollars-per-patient spent, for example, on AIDS/HIV or breast cancer versus traumatic brain injury is tenfold.

So here we have a disease that results in 80,000 new disabilities annually and the spending on research is a drop in the bucket. Most of the traumatic brain injury statistics we have are a decade old, largely due to a shortage of funding for research over several generations. We're faced with many more questions about traumatic brain injury than we have answers because traumatic brain injury patients have not been followed in a prospective, longitudinal, systematic way to determine the true burden of the disease.

What we need, first and foremost, is a more detailed vocabulary to describe traumatic brain injury. When someone gets a brain injury, with the lack of standardization in data collection and outdated approaches to traumatic brain injury classification, we've defaulted to crude categories of mild, moderate and severe. Imagine attempting to cure cancer with such broad adjectives -- it's not going to work.

Traumatic brain injury also is looked at as an "event." Almost everything else in medicine -- whether it's diabetes or cancer or heart disease -- is approached as a process to ensure patients get appropriate counseling and pathways to recovery. We're not doing that with traumatic brain injury. Because we don't really know, in fact, what the natural history of traumatic brain injury is for everybody across the spectrum, what we do now is simply turn our backs to most of these patients. I think that's absolutely inappropriate.

The responsibility for sustained, high-quality traumatic brain injury research falls to the National Institutes of Health. While an increase is unlikely, it's important to pressure the NIH, as a federal agency, to reallocate its budget, given the burden of disease they're dealing with in traumatic brain injury.

We owe that to the millions of once and future traumatic brain injury patients languishing in an epidemic that can no longer be silenced.
Picture
 

Stan Van Gundy believes the MVP race is already over, and Derrick Rose of the Chicago Bulls is going to win it.

"I don't think it's wide open. The media seems to have made their decision, and they're the ones that vote. So I think it's over," Van Gundy said Wednesday night as his Orlando Magic prepared to play the New York Knicks. "I mean, I just listen and read. I think it's over. Derrick Rose has it. I haven't really read or heard a media guy who is going another way at this point. I'd be shocked if he doesn't win it."
Votes from selected sportswriters and broadcasters are due back at the league office on Thursday, April 14 -- the day after the regular season ends. The award is announced at some point during the playoffs. Last year, LeBron James received 116 of 123 first-place votes.

Van Gundy has openly campaigned for Dwight Howard, who is scoring 23.0 points per game -- 1.9 fewer points than Rose. Howard is also second in the league in rebounding (14.3 per game), field goal percent (60 percent) and blocks (2.43).

The Magic began the night with a record of 45-26, only five fewer victories than they had after 71 games last season.

Howard himself acknowledged Wednesday night that Rose is indeed the favorite to win the award, having led the Bulls into first place in the Eastern Conference. Rose is averaging 24.9 points (seventh in the NBA) and 7.8 assists (10th) for a team that has had success despite missing Carlos Boozer and Joakim Noah for long stretches of the season. Also, Rose has become a much better 3-point shooter, making 112 shots from long range this season after making just 32 total over his first two NBA seasons.

"Look, and I've said this before, to me, with his rebounding his scoring and his defense, I don't think there's anybody that impacts as many possessions in a game as Dwight does," Van Gundy said. "I think Derrick Rose has been great. I'll have no problem at all if Derrick Rose wins the MVP. They've got the best record in the East, he's been clearly their leader. You can make a great case for him.

"I think it's a hard choice to make, he's been great. But, I still don't think anyone impacts as many possessions a game as Dwight does.

Magic assistant coach Patrick Ewing seconded Van Gundy's opinion: "Everyone's talking about Derrick Rose. Not to take anything away from him; he's having a fantastic year, too. But they need to start putting Dwight Howard's name in the mix. Without him, who knows where we would be?"
Picture